General Meeting (23 - 28)

Week 9: GM23; Date: Wed (06/07/11); Time: (9.00 – 12.00 pm);Venue: BN Lvl 2


Present: All
Agenda: Slopes analysis, platform and excavation cost. Our geotech consultant seems to be having problems in the preparation of platform and slopes but with proper coaching from Abbas from Cyrus consultants he should be able to tackle this problem with ease. Once we establish an appropriate platform and identifying the slopes then we can confirm a preferable layout with regards to our four criteria of considerations for conceptual design namely: Cost, Time, Technical Feasibility and Sustainability. With minimum cost, time and sound consideration for technical feasibility and sustainability then we should confirm the layout that we should adopt for this project.


Week 9: GM 24; Date: Fri (08/07/11); Time: (9.00 – 12.00 am); Venue: BN Lvl 2
Present: All
Agenda: Changes to be made for Water and Road layout. All these changes must be indicated to Suffi so that he can prepare a new platform and calculate the necessary slopes and indicate this slopes on the drawing. For Road layout, the respective lengths are:
Layout 1 = 1237.1593m
Layout 2 = 1440.5889m

Week 10: GM 25; Date: Mon (11/07/11); Time: 11.30 – 1.30 pm; Venue: BN Lvl 2
Present: All
Agenda: To check if our Geotech consultant has completed the required work on platform and slopes. Unfortunately he hasn’t and as project manager, I have to make arrangement with Abbas to meet with Suffi and to discuss the area of weaknesses being encountered by Suffi. An arrangement can be made for them to meet tomorrow (12/07/11), at COE food court before the CCM7 which is scheduled for Wednesday (13/07/11).


Week 10: GM26; Date: Wed (13/07/11); Time: (9.00 – 1.30 pm); Venue: BN Lvl 2
Present: All
Agenda: To show Ir. Zakaria our progress of work on platform and slopes for the two proposed layout.
As it happened, Suffi arrived about 12.00 pm and we had consultation with Ir. Zakaria suggested that there is still more work required in this task especially in the clear indication of slopes. This must be carried out immediately before 3.00 pm where CCM 7 will proceed before we compile our preliminary report together with the preliminary presentation.


Week 10: GM 27; Date: Fri (15/07/11);Time: (9.30 am–2.00pm) Venue: BM level 1
Present: All
Agenda: To compile the preliminary report from each department and to submit by the end of the day.
Each department head submit to the project manager and the PM will compile all these report and submit to Ir. Zakaria’s office by 5 pm.


Week 11: GM 28; Date: Wed (20/07/11);Time: (9.30am – 1.30pm); Venue: BN lvl 2
Present: All
Agenda: Having submitted the preliminary report for our group, we have unfinished tasks to perform namely, detailed design, costing, boq, tender contract documents, specifications, drawings, etc.
Prepare for CCM 8 which is scheduled for the afternoon from 3.00 -6.00 pm, Wed (20/07/11)

Client Consultant Meeting (CCM 8)

Week 9 – CCM8: Date: Wed (20/07/11); Time: 3-5.00 pm; Venue: EAC Rm (BN lvl2)

Present:  Client (Innovatif Bijak Sdn Bhd) – Ir. Zakaria; 4 members of SLEC and 2 members of Cyrus companies.

Agenda:  - Presentation of company profile (amended)

SLEC company  (group 2) presents first

Cyrus company (group 3) presents second

Minutes:   -

Areas of weakness were outlined by Ir. Zakaria for both groups

• Minutes were all noted down by Head Department of Water and Sewerage, Ir. Teh Chin Hooi.
• The main areas to discuss about the long-life learning and sustainability of project.
• Changes for preliminary report submit on this week.

PM:

1. In the matrix table, only show sustainablity(remove life-long learning), modify into technical feasibility
2. Add in structural cost and valve cost.
3. Show Spefication of contract in preliminary report, bill of quantity and mention the type of contract

Structural

1. Rearrange lifelong learning according to the sequence of importance.

Water & Drainage

1. Present valve and manhole in next CCM
2. Modify the Lifelong learning
3. Location of suction tank to be confirm.

Highway & Environmental

1. Calculate traffic to determine 1 lane or 2 lane.
2. Usually when come in is 1 lane but go out is 2 lane.
3. Show Stop or Berhenti?
4. Road for STP should be 1 lane
5. Present Environmental Management Plan (EMP) in next ccm.

Geotechnical

1. ABSENT.

General comment in Cyrus Companies.

1. Use term of Shallow Foundation and Deep Foundation.
2. Usage of drill pile and micro-pile.

Client Consultant Meeting (CCM 7)

Week 10 – CCM7: Date: Wed (13/07/11); Time: 3-6.00 pm; Venue: EAC Rm (BN lvl2)

Present:  Client (Innovatif Bijak Sdn Bhd) – Ir. Zakaria; all members of SLEC and Cyrus companies.

Agenda:  - Presentation of company profile (amended)

Cyrus company (group 3) presents first

SLEC company  (group 2) presents second

Minutes:   -

Areas of weakness were outlined by Ir. Zakaria for both groups

• Minutes were all noted down by Head Department of Water and Sewerage, Ir. Teh Chin Hooi.
• The main areas to decide the main layout.
• Discussion and compared on both layout.
• Submission of preliminary report on this week.

PM:

1. Lifelong learning
2. Report of sustainability
3. Choose Layout 1
4. Matrix Table
5. DOB cost

Structural

1. No Task
2. Present Sustainability and Lifelong learning next presentation.

Water & Drainage

1. Drawing not compile with the others

Highway & Environmental

1. Sustainability and Lifelong Learning in next Presentation

Geotechnical

1. There are 4 types of soil, determine it. (For example: USM etc.)
2. Check the flood level with drainage department.
3. Work on Foundation.

Client Consultant Meeting (CCM 6)

Week 9 – CCM6: Date: Wed (6/07/11); Time: 3-6.00 pm; Venue: EAC Rm (BN lvl2)

Present:  Client (Innovatif Bijak Sdn Bhd) – Ir. Zakaria; all members of SLEC and Cyrus companies.

Agenda:  - Presentation of company profile (amended)

SLEC company  (group 2) presents first

Cyrus company (group 3) presents second

Minutes:   -

Areas of weakness were outlined by Ir. Zakaria for both groups

• Minutes were all noted down by Head Department of Water and Sewerage, Ir. Teh Chin Hooi.
• The main areas to decide the main layout.
• Discussion and compared on both layout.
• Submission of preliminary report on next week.
• A GM 24 has to called on Friday morning  at 9 am to discuss these important issues. 

PM:

1. Lifelong learning
2. Report of sustainability
3. Comparison of 2 proposed layout
4. Gantt chart
5. DOB cost

Structural

1. Give service loading to geotechnical department
2. Sustainability service

Water & Drainage

1. Behind schedule
2. Work on the Local authority
3. Head lost and final discharge
4. When stiff the pipe is above the ground

Highway & Environmental

1. Change of road to access road
2. Cut & Fill on road

Geotechnical

1. Layout 1 and layout 2 cut and field cross section
2. Check the slope of each side

General comment in Cyrus Companies.

1. Lifelong learning
2. Report of sustainability

General Meeting (18 - 22)

Week 7: GM18; Date: Fri (24/06/11); Time: (9.30 – 12.00pm); Venue: BN lvl 2

Present: All

Agenda: To discuss the minutes that was recorded from CCM4 – Each department head are to take note of the area of weaknesses from CCM4 and try to make amendments for CCM5 in Week 8. Try to complete the work on the finalized layout of the buildings.

Week 8: GM19; Date: Mon (27/06/11); Time: (11.00 – 1.30pm); Venue: BN lvl 2

Present: All

Agenda: Same as the agenda for Week 7. Amendments for each department are the responsibility of each department head.

Week 8: GM20; Date: Wed (29/06/11); Time: (9.00 – 12.00pm)

Comment: Unfortunately, our venue for meeting was taken but we were all encouraged to continue with our 

respective work privately and convene at 2.00pm at BN lvl 2 to compile our presentation for CCM5.

Week 8: GM 21; Date: Fri (01/07/11); Venue: BN lvl 2

Comment: Since most of the members were busy with the submission of first draft thesis, I have allowed the to do so I have to prepare the letter for Pengarah JPS WPKL which stands for Jabatan Pengairan Dan Saliran Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur.

The letter was the taken to the Civil Engineering Dept clerk to prepare the letterhead the handed over to Ir. Zakaria to sign and the letter to be collected on Mon (03/07/11)

Week 9: GM22; Date: Mon (03/07/11); Time: (11.00 – 1.30 pm); Venue: BN lvl 2

Present: All

Main Agenda: proposed layouts, platform and slopes, excavation costs, CCM6 presentation, BOQ, Tender documents, collection of letter, progress of project, works remaining to be done, next GM etc.

Client Consultant Meeting (CCM 5)

CCM 5 Minutes  Date: 29/06/11; Venue: EAC Rm, BN level 2; Time: 3.00 – 6.00pm

Present: Client :  Innovatif Bijak Sdn Bhd; Rep.: Ir. Zakaria

               Consultants:  Cyrus Eng. Consultants  - All present

                                     SL Eng. Consultants -  Ir. Sam, Ir. Hossein, Ir. Camelia

                                        Apologies: Ir. Teh Chin Hooi, Ir. Suffi

Agenda: The two consultant groups, Cyrus and SL Eng. Consultants are to present their progress for Week 8 for CCM5.

Progress of CCM5:
Cyrus Eng consultants presented first: Their main area for presentation was on layout of the buildings with much focus on creating a platform and slopes.
SL Eng consultants presented second: The main area for presentation is supposed to be focused on platform and slopes, but due to the absent of Ir. Suffi and Ir. Teh Chin Hooi, the presentation was not able to proceed due to lack of information available. Hopefully, this can be done with the presence of the Head for Geotechnical Engineering, Ir. Suffi.

Minutes:

The Client Ir. Zakaria was interested only in one particular area and that is the slide indicating  proposal for the two layouts where the platform and slopes are to be clearly indicated for the two layouts.  This was not possible since our head for geotechnical section has sent his apologies due to illness.

Geotechnical Section: Due to the unavailability of Ir. Suffi for CCM5, the following comments must be taken into consideration so that we are able to proceed with our detailed design, BOQ and then proceed to Contract Tender Documents, compiling and submission of reports.

Areas to focus on for Week 9:

1. Preparation for the overall proposed layouts with the platform and slope clearly indicated.
2. Tabled calculations for the cut and fill volumes
3. Total volumes of cut and fill in (m³)
4. Excavations cost for the two layouts
5. Compare the cost for the each excavations
6. Choose your layout from these two costs.
7. Road and Transport section to proceed with the layout and design details.
8. Water Engineering section to proceed with layout and details design.
9. Structure section to proceed with the detail designs.
10. Each department are prepare BOQ for materials to be used.
11. BOQ of each section to be submitted to management section for calculation of the total cost for the project.
12. From these total cost of project, a Contract Tender Documents is to be prepared and a Tender advertisement is to be published for Contractors to apply for the contract to the project.

Contact Us

Administrative Office

Lot 1 & 2, Jalan Flora 1, Tmn Impian Ehsan 43300 Balakong, Selangor, Malaysia

Tel: 03-87397285;  Fax: 03-87397286  

E-mailto: slec@hotmail.com;   website: www.slec.com

Branch Office

Lot 3 & 4, Jalan P/6, Kawasan Perindustrian Bangi, 

43650 Bandar Baru Bangi,

Selangor

Tel: 03-87397287;  Fax: 03-87397288 

E-mailto: slec@hotmail.com;   website: www.slec.com

Client-Consultant Meeting (CCM 1 - 4)

Week 2 – CCM1; Date: Wed (18/05/11); Time: 3-6pm; Venue: EAC Room (BN Lvl2)

Present:  Client (Innovatif Bijak Sdn Bhd) – Ir. Zakaria; all members of SLEC and Cyrus companies.

Agenda:  - Presentation of company profile

-          Cyrus company (group 1) presents first

-          SLEC company (group 2) presents second

Minutes:   - Areas of weakness were outlined by Ir. Zakaria for both groups

-          Minutes of the meeting were all noted down by Teh and to be raised in our next GM

-          The main areas were to amend our company profile for next weeks CCM and to be presented again

-          To allocate amended tasks and sent by e-mail to our group members.

Week 3 – CCM2: Date: Wed (25/05/11); Time: 3-6pm; Venue: EAC Rm (BN lvl2)

Present:  Client (Innovatif Bijak Sdn Bhd) – Ir. Zakaria; all members of SLEC and Cyrus companies.

Agenda:  - Presentation of company profile (amended)

- SLEC company  (group 2) presents first

- Cyrus company (group 3) presents second

Minutes:   - Areas of weakness were outlined by Ir. Zakaria for both groups

- Minutes were all noted down by Teh

- The main areas were to amend our company profile again  week before compiling report and submitting

- To allocate amended tasks and sent by e-mail to our group members.

- Both the presentation slide and a pdf copy of the company profile  have to be submitted

- Discussion on work schedule and the next work is on layout 

- Try out 2 or 3 layouts and see which one is suitable

- All the minutes and criticism are to be prepared by Teh and e-mailed to each group member

- A GM5 has to called on Friday morning  at 9 am to discuss these important issues  

Week 5 – CCM3: Date: Wed (8/06/11); Time: 3-7.40 pm; Venue: EAC Rm (BN lvl2)

Present:  Client (Innovatif Bijak Sdn Bhd) – Ir. Zakaria; all members of SLEC and four representative of the Cyrus companies.

Agenda:

Presentation of company profile (amended)

SLEC company  (group 2) presents first

 Cyrus company (group 3) presents second

Minutes: 

• Areas of weakness were outlined by Ir. Zakaria for both groups
• Minutes were all noted down by Teh
• The main areas were to the proposed layout.
• To allocate amended tasks and sent by e-mail to our group members.
• Discussion on work schedule and the layout

• All the minutes and criticism are to be prepared by Teh and e-mailed to each group member

A GM 13 has to called on Monday morning  at 11 am to discuss these important issues 

PM:

• Oral presentation skill
• The layout must be clear, don’t block the landmark
• Key plan is from architecture drawing
• Gantt chart progress rearrange
• Geotechnical department will interface with water & drainage and Highway & transport department in order to come out with the most technically allowable and sustainable level of the site.
• Layout must show site boundary (whole site plan)
• Comparison of 2 proposed site location
• Show the 4 element that will affect the choose of the proposed location
• In time consideration, more cut more fill, more cut less fill or less cut more fill will take more time?
• When no exportation or importation of soil, will save more time.
• The volume of cut and fill will be same or not in order to get to the proposed level, and why?
• Show the road level and platform level in the layout

Structural: 

• Modify the words which using yellow color into others color
• Take note of the structural grid dimension
•  Study the architect work concept and build out structural drawing
• Exit and entrance only showed in architectural drawing but not structural drawing.
•  Interface with other department about the guideline
• Structural system is based on requirement.
• Clarify the reason to use the material.
• Correction the way of showing the concrete grade

Water & Drainage

•  MSIG, what is the content of this guideline.
•  Show the layout in the concepture design of sewerage, drainage and water reticulation
• Type of valve
• This department is interface with other department
• Drainage system, when to use minor and major system, the ARI to be used for minor and major system for hospital.
• The size of the drain which will be used.
• Water pipe is locate beside or between the road, what’s the relationship with JKR?
• Is water reticulation related with MPSJ?

Highway & Environmental

•  Material for road
• Show the road connected to existing road in the layout
• Show environmental concept in the layout
• Showing the environmental details on drawing

Geotechnical

• What’s the relation with Jabatan Ketua Pengarah Tanah and Galian
• Only show civil work
• Show layout in conceptual design

General comment in Cyrus Companies.

•  Examine the valley of the layout
•  Cut more can fill in those valley or other  lower land that not being used
• Check existing stream.
• According to guideline, there is preferred to be one culvert than multiple culvert at the same location, it’s for easier to maintenance and won’t be stuck easily. STP must have some distance apart from the building.
• Both WT tank must be together.
• Composite design for RC.
• Design complicated structural with easy concept
• Road design must connect to the access road.

Week 7 – CCM4: Date: Wed (22/06/11); Time: 3-7.50 pm; Venue: EAC Rm (BN lvl2)

Present:  Client (Innovatif Bijak Sdn Bhd) – Ir. Zakaria; all members of SLEC and Cyrus companies.

Agenda:  - Presentation of company profile (amended)

-          Cyrus company (group 3) presents first

-          SLEC company  (group 2) presents second

Minutes:  

• Areas of weakness were outlined by Ir. Zakaria for both groups
•  Minutes were all noted down by Teh
• The main areas were the concepture design
• Discussion on Gantt Chart
• All the minutes and criticism are to be prepared by Teh and e-mailed to each group member
• A GM 18 has to called on Friday morning  at 9.30 am to discuss these important issues 

General comment in Cyrus Companies.

• Revised and showed the Road ad Platform level
• Final Discharge
• Tapping Point
• The Slab system to be used
• Environment part need to show the water browser, check dam,  temporary earth drain, silk trap, silk fence, etc.
•  Revised EMP
• Drainage, need to study and revised the catchment.

PM:

•  Layout 1 and 2 location
• Gantt Chart Error
•  Layout 1 have problem
• Show the Table which compare  Layout 1 and layout 2 due to each technical department, is it critical ?

Structural

• Cost need to follow department of statistic, with list and prove, or can get from QS or which publish by JKR.
•  Pre stress slab can be considered.
•   Beam slab system: advantage part, check the long spam
•  Advantage of flat slab system, check the term “ do not required reinforcement.”
• Check the Disadvantage on medium span.
•  Supporting Brittle why not suitable? Client comment shouldn’t have any problem with that.
•  Check the low floor to floor high, is it disadvantage or advantage? It can save cost of bricks, piping and etc.
•  Add photo for the slabs system.
•  Need to explain more detail about ripped slabs.
•  Composite slab, check the fire resistance.
• Basic ratio can go to 125, try check.
•   For M&E building should be 175, show the proof why it’s 150mm.
• Car park should be unbraced cause no wall
• Check the car park have wall or not
•  H for column is 4m

Water & Drainage

• Distribution cost for water tapping.
•  The system of water piping, is loop or branch.
• Check the pressure of water tapping point.
•  After checking pressure only decide which water tank system to be provided.
• Consider the cost of loop and branch system
•  What is Q pre and Q post, what to do when Q post is > Q pre.
•  OSD system cannot be on hill
• STP should be low elevation
• When can use uPVC pipe.
• Drop manhole and normal manhole.
• Check the final discharge and Final discharge from the authority.
• Revised the location of Water tank, detention pond and STP.
• Revised the catchment.

Highway & Environmental

• Check all the environment assessment.
• Road design should connect to the main road.
• The speed and length of acceleration and deceleration lane.

Geotechnical

• List the BH clearly.
• Cut profile for determine foundation of building.
•  When hit the gravel, should be bed rock,check back at 12m, section c-c
•  Why choose layout 1 not layout 2?
•  Need more BH point

General Meeting (GM 1 - 17)

Week 1 – GM 1 ( first group meeting)
Date: Fri. (13/05/11); Time: 2.30pm; Venue: BM 0-011
Present:  Hossein, Camelia, Teh, Samuela
Agenda:            

1. To give out handout (softcopy and hard copy to members)
2. To appoint company secretary
3. To allocate tasks for preparation of company profile
4. To obtain phone  and e-mail contacts from members
5. Allocated tasks to be send by e-mail

Week 2 – GM 2; Date: Wed (18/05/11); Time: 9.30 – 10pm; Venue: BN (lvl 2)
Present: Hossein, Teh, Camelia, Sam
Main Agenda:    - To compile all the work allocations which was e-mailed earlier
The compilation will be done by Camelia
Final checking is done before we allocate parts in the presentation
At 2.30 pm we meet outside EAC room to rehearsal the actual presentation
From 3.00 – 6pm, we have our first Client-Consultant meeting (CCM1) to present our company profile to our client Innovatif Bijak Sdn Bhd represented by Ir. Zakaria

Week 3 – GM3; Date: Mon (23/05/11); Time: 9.45am; Venue: BN (lvl 2)

Present:  Teh, Camelia, Sam

Apology: Hossein (sick)

Agenda:  

1. To compile the work allocations that was assigned through e-mail
2. After compiling by Camellia, we then checked the presentation to see if there is any change needed
3. Not all the work was submitted so the work was not complete
4. A next meeting (GM4) was decided for Wed (9.30am), (25/05/11)

Week 3 - GM4; Date: Wed (25/05/11); Time: 9.30 am: Venue: BN (lvl 2)

Present: Teh, Hossein, Camelia, Sam

Agenda: 

1. To complete the compiling work left off from Monday
2. To obtain the remaining task allocation for the amendment
3. To welcome our new group member who has been assigned as head of geotechnical department Mohamad Suffi Bin Mohamad Muslih (CE082514)
4. To give out Integrated Design handout – soft copy and hard copy to Suffi
5. To allocate task for the company profile presentation – resume, scope services, range of expertise, organization chart, past projects etc.
6. Recompile and insert the geotechnical section in our company profile.
7. To break for lunch and reconvene at 2.30pm for allocation of presentation part and rehearsal our part in CCM2 meeting at 3pm
8. Met again at 2.30 pm as discussed

Week 3 – GM5; Date: Fri (27/05/11); Time: 9.00am; Venue: BN (lvl 2)

Present: Camelia, Hossein, Sam

Apologies: Teh (sick), Suffi (sick)

Agenda: 

1. Compiling the company profile
2. Finalise draft for submission
3.   Layout for Acc building, M & H Building, Multi- storey carpark

Week 4 – GM6, Date: Mon (30/5/11), Time: 11.30 am – 1.30 pm

Present: all

Agenda: 

• layout of building to be determined by Suffi (not finished) to be deferred        to 4.30pm

Week 4- GM7, Date: Mon (30/5/11); Time: 4.30 pm

Present: Camelia, Suffi, Sam

Agenda: 

• To continue from the meeting in the morning, layout plan is to be determined by Geotech and Road and Transport  and Environmental Head

Week 4 - GM8; Date: Tues(31/5/11); Time: 4.30 pm

Present: Suffi, Camelia, Sam

Apologies: Chin Hooi, Hossein

Agenda: 

• To draft out the layout plan of the building, to determine cut and fill, cost, time, technical feasibility, environmental sustainability, mostly geotech, traffic and environment

Week 4 – GM10; Date: Fri (3/6/11); Time: 9.00pm

Present: All

Agenda:   Discuss about Preliminary Report presentation -

• Propose layout at least two options including: Mostly Week 5 Work schedule

Week 5 – GM11; Date: Mon (6/6/11); Time: 11.30am

Present: All

Agenda:

•   Discuss about Preliminary Report presentation – Each department head are to look at the task allocation as described in the work schedule for week 5 and prepare for the CCM3 which is scheduled for Wed afternoon (3 - 6pm)

Week 5 – GM12; Date: Wed (8/6/11); Time: 9.30 – 11.30 am

Present: All

Agenda: As for GM 11 –

•  To finalise our parts for the CCM3 which is scheduled for the afternoon Each member are to prepare their individual slides and the compile at 2.00pm before presentation at 3.00 pm. Most of the  work are outlined in the work scheduled for week 5.

Challenges faced being faced so far:

•   Integrated design itself is challenging since most of the work are integrated and are dependent on each other. For example, the road and transport department is not able to prepare a layout before the layout for the buildings are determined by the geotechnical section. Likewise the water and sewerage department is not able to proceed with the layout unless the road and building layout are first determined. So all the work are integrated which means that the start of a particular work schedule may depend entirely on the completion of the other and so forth.

Week 6: GM13; Date: Mon (13/05/11); Time: 11.30 – 1.30 pm

Present: All

Agenda: 

• Discuss  about the minutes from CCM3 – and note the amendments that is required before preparing for CCM4 which is scheduled for Week 7, Wed (22/06/11)

Week 6: GM14; Date: Wed (15/05/11); Time:  (9.00 – 11 am)

Present: All

Agenda: 

• As for GM13 – and start preparing on individual task for CCM4 which covers mainly on the work schedule for Week 6 and Week 7. Each member are reminded to follow the work schedule closely so that they are familiar with their work task for a given week. It must also be noted that in integrated design, work schedule for a week must be finished in time so that the work schedule for the next week is not delayed into the following week.

Week 6: Date: Wed (15/05/11); Time: (2.00 -4.00pm)

Talk: Attended by Civil and Electrical Eng. Dept. students

Title: Transmission Lines for TNB by Datuk Prof. Ir. Romelli

Present: All

Week 6: GM 15; Date: Fri (17/05/11); Time: (9.30 – 11am)

Present: All

Agenda: 

• Standard Drawing, Water pond, STP, Silt Trap, Detention pond, Suction Tank, Evaluation tank, guidelines for water supply, water supply layout to wait for the completion of layout of roads, Malaysian Sewerage Industry guidelines Volume III, IV, V

Week 7: GM 16; Date: Mon (20/6/11); Time: (11.30 -1.30 pm)

Present: All

Agenda: 

• Qpeak, Minor and major system, Tapping point, distribution cost, existing manhole, nearest STP, costing

Week 7: GM 17; Date: Wed (22/06/11); Time: (9.30 am – 12.00 pm)

Present: All

Agenda: 

• MPSJ – Subang Jaya, MSMA manual – Malaysia’s Standard guideline and design criterior for water, drainage, storm water etc.

Company Certificate

Past Project

Project Title: Ampang Puteri Specialist Hospital

Client:  KPJ Healthcare Berhad

Location : Ampang Point

Project Cost: RM150 million   

Completion: November 2007 

Indah Point Interchange at Pulau Indah, Selangor, Malaysia.

Client: Wijaya Sdn Bhd

Project Description: Design of the 1700m long bridge with ground treatment for approach embankments to the two ramps at Indah Point

Completion: early 2005

Approach Embankment to Bridge across PLUS Expressway at Bernam Jaya

Client: Syarikat Muhibbah Perniagaan & Pembinaan Sdn Bhd

Project Description: Design of alternative foundation system for the bridge approach embankment. The alternative foundation system proposed is pile embankment with variable Pile length (transition piles) together with temporary surcharge. This alternative system prevents differential settlement between the bridge and approach embankment which is common problem on the bridge approaches

Completion : 2008

Slope Rehabilitation Works at KM 32.6 SB Linkedua Expressway near Senai, Johor

Client: Linkedua Expressway Bhd

Project Description: Design of the rehabilitation measures to remedy the 2-berm slope with improvement of the surface and sub-surface drainage system

Completion: early 2010

Taman Bukit Minyak Indah

Client: Usaha Maju Sdn. Bhd.

Completion:2010  

Location: Kuala Lumpur 

Type: Terrace  

Tenure: Freehold

The Meritz

Completion:2008   

Location: Kuala Lumpur   

Type: High Rise Residence   

Tenure: Freehold

Putrajaya Wetland & Lake Development

Client: Putrajaya Holding Sdn. Bhd

Location: Putrajaya

Project Cost: RM90 million

Completion: November 2004

Project Title: Taman Tasik Universiti Teknologi Petronas

Client: University Technology Petronas

Location : Tronoh, Perak Darul Ridzuan

Project Cost : RM50 million

Completion  : May 2007